The House and Senate planned to vote on the spending plan on Thursday, the time limit before the expiry of a palliative very short-term funding measure worked on late Friday night. About two days between the revelation of details of the plan Tuesday morning and the Thursday vote, Republicans and Democrats have a chance to express their skepticism about the Bill.
Jordan's Jim representative of Ohio, who is Chairman of the study Commission Republican of the influential House, said Tuesday that he would oppose the measure because it does not cut in federal spending.
"Even if I respect that some Republican colleagues will be finally support this deal spending," Mr. Jordan said in a statement. "" "". I think voters are asking us to set our sights higher. ?
The Committee, composed of approximately 175 Republican House, forced the House Appropriations Committee to push higher reductions in its beak original spending, ultimately failed in the Senate.
While only 28 Republicans voted against the deck plan to keep money flowing to the vote on Thursday, it is likely that some of the Republicans who supported the measure sought to avoid a Government shutdown and will vote nay on the Bill to fund the Government through the rest of the year.
In a meeting with journalists, the majority leader House, representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, while saying that he understood that the Bill was "strong Republican support," conceded Tuesday that he was not sure that the Bill would pass without the support of Democrats. "Certainly we will always ask for them," he said about the Democrats.
House Democrats also largely supported the agreement reached on Friday evening, but it was a little unclear where they would be held this week on a Bill hacks away at some of their favorite programs, although reductions are less than Republicans had requested.
"My presumption, it is we do not know where are our people," representative, h. Steny Hoyer, the minority whip, said Tuesday morning in a meeting with journalists. "I do not think that they know where their people are," he said of Republicans.
If more than 24 members Republican defects, Democrats would be necessary to pass the legislation. The failure of the law - a project unlikely but not impossible, prospect - would lead to a decision of Government.
Large Republican defections would not necessarily lead to this result, but it would be an embarrassment for President John a. Boehner.
Republican leaders moved to show the unit for the measurement, which incorporates meaningful concessions from Democrats, who has been a success of the environmental and education programs, and the Republicans, who did not get anywhere near $ 61 billion in reductions they sought.
"I applaud the leadership of Chairman Boehner in securing tens of billions of dollars in spending cuts, forcing the President and the leaders of his party to the retirement of their wanton profligacy," representative Paul d. Ryan of Wisconsinthe Chairman of the House Budget Committee, said in a news release. "The history of cut spending in turn the page of pervasive culture of spending Washington, to send a welcome signal to creators of jobs and cleaning the damage without previous budget left by the last Congress.
The plan of spending cuts in the current financial year $ 38 billion. The House will also vote on two separate measures: one at the end of the federal funding of family planning and the second cancel the redesign of the health of 2009. If the invoices are approved, they will go to the Senate for a vote on the same day, where family planning and health measures are almost certainly doomed.
Last week, a fight over money for family planning has threatened to derail negotiations on the measure to fund the Government through September 30. House Republicans sought to withdraw all federal funding for family planning and other family planning services and to deliver those dollars to the States instead of this. The President Obama and Senate Democrats firmly to rider of this policy, and it was finally abandoned.
On Tuesday, Mr. Cantor said that Republicans would continue to seek ways to take federal money to family planning. "Where I think that we have always been," he said, "is to reflect that we believe very strongly that the Government $ should not be used to fund abortion." (In fact it is already in a federal statute to use Federal dollars to get an abortion.)
With the Senate, the expenditure face skepticism of the more conservative members plan, which do not make enough cups, and most liberal members, such as Senator Bernard Sanders, independent of Vermont, who said Tuesday that he would reject the measure because it was "Reverse Robin Hood in meaning." Again, passing in this Chamber appeared likely.
没有评论:
发表评论